Some would argue that you can't put a number on a
personality. Still, I am attempting to show a way to "measure" someone else's
personality traits in the context of how you perceive them, using your own
values as a reference. It is also intended to account for the fact that these
traits are dynamic and will change over time.
All the studies I took
on the subject, in the past, always seem to try to put them into a fixed box
and I had a great deal of difficulty accepting that notion especially when I
put it in reference to friends who seem to demonstrate a tendency to have
shifts in the traits from one time or another and, being male, noticed that to
be even more prevalent on how the opposite sex reacted to me with pretty much
the same conditions in place on my side.
And when I look at the image at the top, I find I fit into all the boxes now quite a lot, and maybe that is a sign that, as you get older, you can develop a more well-rounded personality and jump in and out of it as the situation dictates. Some days I find myself more one type than the other, and the same is true about the time of day.
I suggest the scale depicted here, with coloured bars
denoting two personality traits and how comfortable or uncomfortable I am with those in the other person. The first one shows I'm
comfortable with number 1 but not with number 2. And since I
don't like the concept of a fixed position or box, they are relative to mine
and have many degrees or levels of intensity, much like a gradient scale has.
So Number 1 could be Cooperative/Uncooperative and Number 2
could be Respectful/Disrespectful in the measure below. I am extremely
comfortable with the first (very cooperative) and not so with how they show
respect for others (quite disrespectful). So you would have to decide how
important each trait is and perhaps put them into a hierarchy, either
mentally or in hard-copy versions for business use.

Now, some are saying, "Why would you do this, and what purpose does it serve?" Well, the Internet seems to have spawned several problems in communicating with others, in that it is quite sterile in how it
handles human contact. You do not sense the same things in a conversation
with others in a chat window like you would face-to-face. You certainly can't
get their body language (without video help). Voice inflections and accents
would be mostly muted or difficult to convey, and their mood is very hard to
discern as well. ALL CAPS can be seen as anger, shouting, or rudeness, and as very happy if mixed, as in the phrase "you are wonderful TYVM".
So
you might be involved in a group discussion with people from many countries (and business
is facing this now, since so many are worldwide), and you want to assess someone
as a new member of that group and identify the desirable traits you all want in that candidate. This measurement scale, depicted above,
can help set reference points for the parties to share and agree on
where they see the "candidate" fitting on each trait. A sales manager in
Quebec, Canada, can work with the Marketing
Department in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, to understand how an effective advertising program
would work in that part of Canada, using personality scales to drive the point home.
The
reason a lot of US-based operations (and, for that matter, the rest of Canada) fail so badly in the province of Quebec is that they fail to understand the
significant differences in personality between the two, and a lot of hard work
goes all for naught. They try to force their own approach on one that does not
accept it the same way, and it ends up being much like the "Talk louder and
slower" approach to speaking to a "foreigner" that some Americans use abroad.
It just doesn't work, leaving a sour taste in the "foreigners'" mouths,
and they grow to dislike each other instead of trying to work out their
communication and personality differences. I had extensive hands-on
exposure to this in action, and it is a reality that isn't limited to that locale. Add other languages into the mix, religion, and lots
more miles, and it gets even more complex, and the Internet largely ignores these
important differences.
Understanding
others is sort of a passion with me, and I take great pride in getting better
and better at it. I have been told that I should work as a diplomat because of
how I approach others in potentially contentious environments. Still, the truth is, if you tick me off long enough, you get both barrels, backed by an
Uzi, a bazooka, or a tank, depending on how inflexible the other person gets. A dynamic personality can jump from one end of the scale to the other in a short period if the right conditions arise, which can help explain why someone calm and very cooperative can switch very quickly. Simply put, someone just really "pissed them off" in a big way, so you get the brunt of your actions back. That is honesty/dishonesty in action and can even go hard left on the scale, which some see as going overboard, but it can also be perceived as "straight-shooting".
Sometimes
agreeing to disagree and walking away is the best way to deal with these
situations, and using that personality trait measuring system helps tell you how
far apart each of you is from one another. You can either let the sleeping
dogs lie or undo the leashes and let them go frolic in the fields and have a
party. I like the second one a lot more, thank you.